Job application requires a polygraph test for $24K per year position where employees work 9 months on and 3 months off: 'They don't even pretend to care about employee well-being'

Advertisement
  • 01
    r/antiwork u/98746145315.1d I just love receiving job offers with anti- worker language in it. They do not even pretend any longer to care in any way about employee well-being.
  • 02
    From antiwork community on Reddit Hi Greater, Greeting! I hope you are doing good. This is h. I am trying to reach you for the below position, if you find it as a good fit and would like to apply please share your consultant updated resume and salary expectation. Job Title: Accounting Office Administrator Location: Windsor, CO - 90% Remote Duration: 09 Months Job Description: 9 month recurring temp position. We anticipate needing them May-Jan each year . We will accept either a retired person wh
  • 03
    Complete-Ad2227. 1d they need a polygraph test for a 90% remote accounting job? what Reply 1.9k
  • 04
    haswain ⚫ 20h • And for under $50k/year. lol no. J 546
  • 05
    Sparkykc124 • 16h It's part time, so 24k/yr. ... ◇ 180
  • 06
    Blissed_⚫16h And only 9 out of 12 months 99
  • 07
    cometdogisawesome • 15h right, but you need to be able to justify why you only want nine months. 136
  • 08
    Sweaty Illustrator14 • 13h . But still pull 10 hr days...OK 67
  • 09
    from_random_fandom. 18h I've literally failed a polygraph test when I was telling the 100% truth. I don't trust those 303
  • 10
    FUCK_INDUSTRIAL • 18h Retail is the 9th circle of There's a reason they're not admissible in court. 324
  • 11
    இய Previous Noise • 1d We only want them 9 months out of the year, but they need to tell us why they can only work 9 months out of the year? Reply 1.2k
  • 12
    TheOldPug 1d • Want them 9 months out of the year, but don't want a job-hopper. ← 773
  • 13
    joyous_birdie • 20h That's what got me. Wouldn't a job hopper be the perfect candidate for this? 294
  • 14
    Nevermind04 • 23h The Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 makes that last bullet point illegal. ... Reply 28
  • 15
    AmaiBatate • 7h This was 100% not intended from the company that the recruiter just forwards this information. This was information just for the recruiter that they definitely didn't want the candidates to know like this. They expected the recruiter to package this information nicely which is normally part of the recruiters job. Not that I want to defend that, I think it's awful that part of the recruiters job is just sugarcoating awful job environments and demands. - But this recruiter didn't e
  • 16
    papissdembacisse • 17h 6AM to 5PM? Lol Reply
  • 17
    CurlyCADLady ⚫ 23h Why does it say "Hi Greater" at the top? Reply 40
  • 18
    98746145315 OP. 23h Because these template-senders do not give a enough to change anything before mass bcc. 62

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article